Ars Technica logo. Serving the PC enthusiast for over 5x10-2 centuries  

 
Ars Guides.
  Buyer's Guide
  How-To's & Tweaks
  Product Reviews
  Ars Shopping Engine

Technopaedia.
  Technical Blackpapers
  CPU Theory & Praxis
  Ars OpenForum
  Search Ars

Columnar Edifice.
  Wankerdesk
  AskArs!
  Diary of a Geek
  Game.Ars Report   Mac.Ars takes on...
  Linux.Ars

Site Info.
  Subscribe to Ars
  Ars Merchandise
  Who We Ars
  Advertising
  Links



Ars Comdex Report: Wednesday Edition

 

More PDA news from Hannibal, and scents over the 'net

Today, I continued my quest for PDAs, this time stopping by HP's booth to check out their Jornada 720 and 680. There was just one problem with that plan, though. Neither of those products were there. In fact, HP didn't have a single Jornada with a keyboard at their entire pavilion. I have no idea why they chose to leave these products out, and neither did any of the HP reps I talked to. Disappointed and slightly annoyed, I left the HP booth and checked out some of the other PDA offerings on the floor. 

A company called Agenda was showing the VR3, a PDA based on a handheld version of Linux called Linux VR. It didn't take me more than a minute of looking at it to realize that, like its desktop counterpart, Linux VR (at least in this implementation) is interfacially challenged. Or, in non-P.C. speak, it looked like garbage. I left without playing with the device, but Will Ryu tells me that it was performance challenged too. Hmm... maybe some of the other VR devices coming out won't have these problems.

After deciding that nothing I saw on the PDA scene this year looks that much more attractive than my Palm V, and that I'm probably going to just break down and buy a laptop to do Office stuff on, I headed out the perimeter of the floor to investigate some of the smaller booths that often are showing cooler products than the big flashy pavilions in the center of the floor. It wasn't long before I was rewarded with the sight of the Digiscents booth. Digiscents is a company that I've covered before here on Ars, because their mission is to smell-enable the Internet. They have a little machine that sits in front of you on your desk and generates scents from a prearranged palette of smells stored in the device. They released an SDK a while back, which lets developers cook up new scents by combining scents from the existing palette and scent-enable games and applications.

A Digiscents rep was kind enough to sit down with me and demo the product for me and answer questions, so I can tell you what I thought of it based on the prototype they had there. Basically, it was kind of cool, but you can tell that it has a long way to go before the full potential is reached. The rep opened an email with a scented attachment, which was supposed to smell like roses. When he clicked on the roses, I got a slight gust of ostensibly rose-scented air in my face from the little box in front of me. It was rose-scented in the same way that those things you hang in your car are, meaning you can see where it sort of smells somewhat like a rose if you know that that's what it's supposed to be, but the overall impression was of a pleasant artificial air-freshener type scent.

Next, the rep opened up this tropical isle scene that was supposed to smell tropical. Instead, for the first few seconds it smelled like the fake roses. I could tell from talking to him that this is one of the bigger challenges that Digiscents faces--getting the first smell to dissipate from the machine quickly enough to where it doesn't pollute the next one is hard when the first smell was kind of strong. After the roses faded I actually could smell coconut and a few other unidentifiable odors, so it did wind up working eventually.

The main question that I had for the rep was this: what's to keep someone from haX0ring up some sort of rank, rotting flesh smell and mailing it to someone with a name like "spring showers" or something so that they wind up stinking up their workstation? The rep tried to assure me that this was somehow impossible because the machine didn't carry those categories of rank odors like rotting flesh, flatulence, etc. Still, I remained unconvinced. Then he started talking about Digiscents' designs on the gaming market, and I pointed out to him that a developer like iD would definitely want the smell of rotting flesh for their games, so the machine would, in fact, have to support such smells eventually. He agreed, and then tried various other angles on convincing me that there's no way you could prank someone by e-flatulating in their cubicle. I still wasn't convinced, so we went round and round about email, rotting flesh, flatulence, and APIs for like 5 minutes before we both sort of realized that the conversation we were having was sounding more and more bizarre. At this point I just thanked him for his time and took off.

A little ways up from the Digiscents cubicle a company was demoing some wireless 3D glasses technology called The Terminator. As I looked on, there were a number of people standing around with glasses on looking at two monitors that were running two different Star Wars games, each of which had its image slightly doubled. As I found out later, the drivers for the glasses take any DirectX or OGL game and render the even scan lines slightly apart from the odd scan lines. The shuttered LCD glasses then merge these two images, and it gives you the impression that the scene in the monitor has depth. I didn't actually expect this to work very well, so imagine my total shock when I donned the glasses and watched the Tie Fighter game in a very realistic-looking 3D. Now, I've never used the Elsa glasses before, so I really don't have the experience to be able to evaluate this sort of thing. Nonetheless, I was really impressed with what I saw on the first monitor. The second monitor didn't work quite as well, though, for whatever reason. It was running that goofy Star Wars racing game, and the 3D effect wasn't really happening so much with it. But the Tie Fighter game was killer.

This company is selling their glasses on their website, but they haven't really started to move the product out into stores yet. They plan on doing so soon, though, so look for them there.

 

Ator on Bluetooth and display glasses

There was lots of Bluetooth stuff to be found.  Not only did a number of booths have Bluetooth-enabled products, but there was an entire area dedicated to Bluetooth products. Unfortunately, they're pretty much all either not expected until next year, or just demo products not guaranteed to make it into production.  But, it does give an idea of what people are thinking of.  For one thing, most of the major printer manufacturers had enabled their printers.  A number of companies were also showing various Bluetooth speaker/microphone combos for cell phone communication.  Those are sure to be popular, judging by the number of Comdex attendees who were to be seen wandering around with cell phone ear pieces permanently wired to their belts.  Basically, lots of stuff that'll be nice to have around, but at best, most of 'em won't be showing up until at least the middle of 2001.  More on Bluetooth from Will in a bit.

A related family of products that showed up a few times was the glasses-based display.  Most of them were being demoed as ways to watch DVDs, though some could also accept an RGB connection.  Personally, none of them entirely blew me away, but it's definitely preferable to trying to watch a DVD on a laptop screen, especially if the airplane passenger in front of you decides to lean his seat back.  Generally, they followed the model of opaque glasses with dual screens on the inside.  The one exception I saw was from a company called Colorado Micro Display.  Theirs was a rectangle of transparent material that sits over one eye.  While I appreciated the attempt to keep the user connected to the outside world, I found it really difficult to watch the screen with my other eye open.

One more thing: back when the iMac was the new kid on the block, a lot of all-in-one computers started showing up, and there was much complaining that the designs were ripped off from the iMac.  Generally, I dismissed those allegations because it seemed to me that an all-in-one computer would kinda naturally tend to look more or less like an iMac, at least in terms of shape (though those manufacturers who used the iMac shape and bondi blue plastic were definitely showing a lack of innovation).  So, I'm not one to generally hold to those kinds of conspiracy theories.  But check out this picture, and try to tell me it's not a thoroughly blatant rip off of the Cube.

 

Next: DVD+RW, magic pens, and more

 


Dual 2.5GHz Power Mac G5 review

The Sims 2 review

Pipelining: an overview (Part II)

System Guide: September edition

Pipelining: an overview (Part I)

Chris Sawyer's Locomotion review

Multicore, dual-core, and the future of Intel

System Guide: gaming boxes

TrackIR3 Pro review

Doom 3: the review

PowerPC on Apple: An Architectural History, Part I

Virtual machine shootout: Virtual PC vs. VMware

The Pentium: An Architectural History — Part II

Joint Operations: Typhoon Rising game review

AirPort Express review

The Pentium: An Architectural History — Part I

The Ars guide to PCI Express

Beyond Divinity game review

The future of Prescott

Interview with Mozilla.org's Scott Collins

Thief: Deadly Shadows game review

USB 2.0 Hi-Speed Flash drive review

A closer look at Intel's processor numbers and 2004 road map

Far Cry game review

Dell Latitude D800 laptop review

HP Compaq nc6000 laptop review

Hitman: Contracts game review

Deploying a small business Windows 2003 network

Alternative AIM clients for Windows

Inside GNOME 2.6

/etc

OpenForum

Distributed Computing

Take the Poll Technica

FAQ: Celeron overclocking

 

Copyright © 1998-2004 Ars Technica, LLC