Karen and I are in rainy London. Yesterday, we went to a wonderful exhibition at the Victoria & Albert Museum, entitled Modernism. I can't recommend it highly enough. This is the show that the
Photographs weren't permitted, but no matter, because the web site you'll get to if you click that link is astonishing. As is the incredible catalog. One interesting surprise, a table lamp version of the Paul Henningsen light we have hanging over our kitchen table:
One of the show's main themes was the Modernist belief in the role design could play in transforming society. Ultimately, this belief was hijacked by Nazis, Fascists and Communists.
As I read quote after quote, I was struck by many of the similarities to the rising significance of design today. Now, as then, technology is widely viewed as a means for improving human life. Then, as now, many called this vision, "Utopian"; then, without irony. Utopian as it may be, the belief that a widespread appreciation for an integration of the aesthetic and practical aspects of objects would transform both the objects and ourselves continues to energize today's designers. But, covertly.
Why?
Here's the opening line of Simon Jenkins's review of the show in The Guardian:
Go at once. Take a young person to see the Modernism show at the
V&A and feel fear. It is the most terrifying exhibition I have
seen, because it is politics disguised as art. It opens with a word
that says it all - utopia - and ends with an unspoken lie, that this
nihilist ideology became merely a style and is no longer a threat. If
only.
Traumatized by the ease with which these ideas were politicized by 20th century dictators, is it any wonder we've become thoroughly apolitical on the subject of design's socio/psychological potential? Today, only architects address of such transcendent themes (and, as last Sunday's Times pointed out, continue to create considerable controversy).
And, there's no doubt about it: styles become totalitarian (remember platform shoes and love beads?) But I wonder: has the diverse dynamism of modern culture has removed the stopper from that genie-bottle? Could designers return us to a time of "mandated" univocal style?
I don't know.
For every Target there's an Anthropologie; for every Prada a Galliano; for every PT Cruiser an Audi TT; a Bjork for every Nora Jones. Today, choice reigns.
Tags: Modernism Design
Recent Comments